UV in the loop
Treats what passes the lamp
- Treats water only as it passes the unit
- No residual effect inside the well
- Limited effect in dead zones and complex piping
Useful on the circuit; it does not reach the whole water body in the well.
Wellboat oxygenation and wellboat disinfection are two different water jobs on the same well boat. With fish on board, the job is keeping dissolved oxygen stable through loading, transport and unloading — that is what the ABAN-20 oxygenation module is designed for. With the wells empty, the job is disinfecting wells, piping and equipment before the next load — that is what the ARVAND-O3 ozone-nanobubble skid is designed for. This page explains how each one works, how it fits a vessel, what the figures rest on, and what NanoSWIM cannot yet claim.
Both systems are offered through a pilot programme. Every figure below is marked as design basis, calculation or NanoSWIM internal test.
Because they happen at different times, to different water, with different risks. Mixing them up is how suppliers end up promising one box that does everything, and how operators end up with equipment that does neither job well.
ARVAND-O3 is not a treatment for water with fish in it. It runs on isolated, empty wells in a closed loop. ABAN-20 is an oxygenation module, not a disinfection system. What they share is the vessel: the same hull, the same crew, the same seawater pump room and the same pressure on time.
A loaded well is a closed volume carrying a high biomass, and the fish do not consume oxygen at a steady rate. Operators describe the same set of problems:
ABAN-20 treats a sidestream, not the full well flow. The logic runs in four steps:
In NanoSWIM's internal tests, nanoparticle tracking analysis measured mean bubble sizes of about 100–122 nm and concentrations in the order of 10⁸ particles per millilitre. These are internal laboratory measurements, not results from a vessel. For the physics of why bubbles that small behave differently, see how nanobubbles work.
The design philosophy is low pressure, low hydraulic demand and a compact footprint that can be retrofitted. The module is 1.5 × 0.6 × 2.0 m on a stainless-steel frame, with PVC / UPVC piping and manifolds. Because the vessel's seawater pump does the hydraulic work, the electrical load is controls and instrumentation only — approximately 1.5–3 kW. Control is by PLC with an HMI.
On a multi-well vessel, one ABAN-20 per well is recommended, each fed from a common vessel oxygen header. One module per well gives each well its own distribution and adds redundancy, so that a fault on one skid is less likely to affect oxygen in the other wells.
The skid carries the instrumentation the crew needs to see what it is doing: an inlet isolation valve, a water flow meter, an oxygen flow meter, pressure gauges before and after the generator banks, an outlet riser / vent, and sample and sensor points.
ABAN-20 is also membrane-ready: an optional sidestream membrane polishing or disinfection module can be added later without changing the core oxygenation skid. The module carries a 2-year warranty. Full specifications are on the ABAN-20 product page, and the wider transport context is on live fish transport.
The table below is a calculation from published oxygen-consumption models, not a measurement. It takes a two-well vessel with 2 × 1,500 m³ wells at a maximum stocking density of 150 kg/m³ — 225,000 kg of fish per well — at 8 °C.
For salmon it uses O₂ = 82.9 × W^−0.2 × 1.07^T, and for cod O₂ = 80.1 × (1 − e^(−0.185 × T^0.79)), both in mg O₂ per kg fish per hour, with W the fish weight in kg and T the temperature in °C. Flow per well follows from the module's hydraulic design ratio of 10 m³/h per kg O₂/h.
Even the most demanding case, 1 kg salmon at 32.05 kg O₂/h per well, sits well inside one module's design basis of 100 kg O₂/h. One module per well is still recommended — for distribution and for redundancy, not because one well needs more.
| Species | Fish size | Specific O₂ demand | O₂ per well | Flow per well | ABAN-20 per well |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salmon | 1 kg | 142.4 mg/kg/h | 32.05 kg/h | 320.5 m³/h | 1 |
| Salmon | 5 kg | 103.2 mg/kg/h | 23.23 kg/h | 232.3 m³/h | 1 |
| Cod | 1 kg | 49.3 mg/kg/h | 11.09 kg/h | 110.9 m³/h | 1 |
| Cod | 5 kg | 49.3 mg/kg/h | 11.09 kg/h | 110.9 m³/h | 1 |
Calculated from published models, not measured on a vessel. Assumptions: 2 × 1,500 m³ wells, 150 kg/m³, 225,000 kg per well, 8 °C. The cod model has no weight term, which is why both cod rows are identical. Your own vessel is sized against its own wells, species, densities and temperatures.
The second job starts when the fish are off. Between one assignment and the next, the operator has to show that nothing is carried from one load, farm or region to the next — and every hour spent proving it is an hour the vessel is not earning.
ARVAND-O3 is a closed-loop system for planned technical disinfection of the wells, piping and associated equipment between transfer operations. Ozone is made on board, delivered into the water as nanobubbles, circulated through the wells and controlled by measurement. The process chain runs: ozone generator → nanobubble generator → recirculation loop → wellboat tanks → ORP / TRO monitoring → off-gas control.
On board, the operating workflow has five steps:
The control parameters are ORP monitoring, TRO monitoring in seawater, a defined exposure (contact) time, off-gas management and automatic safety shutdown. ARVAND-O3 has no published capacity, ozone output or flow figure: it is sized per vessel, from the well volumes and the circulation loop.
Ozone is hazardous to breathe. That is the starting point of the ARVAND-O3 design, not a footnote to it. The skid is built around keeping ozone where it is meant to be and removing it before anything leaves the system.
Ozone reverts to oxygen. Residual ozone is removed before discharge and off-gas is destroyed at the vent. The whole skid sits on a stainless-steel frame with a footprint of about 2.0 × 2.0 m.
Each existing method does part of the job. UV treats water only as it passes the unit, with no residual effect inside the well and limited effect in dead zones and complex piping. Chemical dosing brings a handling and safety burden, chemical cost, discharge concerns, potential corrosion and more work for the crew. Standard ozone delivered as macro-bubbles has lower gas-transfer efficiency, more off-gassing and wasted ozone, and a longer time to reach the target ORP / TRO.
The reasoning behind delivering ozone as nanobubbles is a design rationale, and we present it as one. Bubbles under 200 nm stay suspended instead of rising and bursting. The aim is higher gas-transfer efficiency, so less ozone is wasted and less off-gas is produced; a longer effective contact time; better reach into tanks, piping and hard-to-reach zones; and an oxidative effect in the water body inside the well, not only in the technical room. Reactive oxygen species formed when the bubbles collapse can enhance microbial inactivation and attack on biofilm. How much of that shows up on a given vessel is exactly what a pilot measures. The longer comparisons are on nanobubbles vs ozone and nanobubbles vs UV.
Biosecurity is only as good as the record behind it. ARVAND-O3 logs ORP and TRO continuously, against a defined contact time, and ends every cycle with verification of safe conditions before the wells are reused. That log is the document: what was treated, for how long, and what the measurements showed when the cycle ended.
The same logic applies to the turnaround itself. A pilot records how long the disinfection and verification actually take on your vessel, so the before-and-after comparison rests on your own clock, not ours. On the oxygen side, the ABAN-20's water and oxygen flow meters, pressure gauges and sample points give the crew a direct reading of what each module is delivering. How this fits the wider framework of standards and documentation is covered on standards and compliance.
This is the section to read before anything else is quoted in a board paper or a tender.
NanoSWIM's technology is patent pending: UK patent application GB2507053.3, "Method and apparatus for water cleaning", filed 8 May 2025 and owned by NanoSWIM AS.
We do not publish an example with someone else's day rate, because yours is the only one that matters. The logic is simple enough to fill in yourself:
Use the hours actually saved during a pilot, not the 50 % target. If the measured saving is small on your vessel, the formula will say so — and that is worth knowing before a fleet decision, not after. Send us your turnaround numbers and we will work through them with you.
Qualitative only. What each method is designed to do, and where it stops.
Treats what passes the lamp
Useful on the circuit; it does not reach the whole water body in the well.
Effective, with a burden attached
Familiar and established, but every litre has to be bought, stored, handled and discharged.
NanoOzone, on the ARVAND-O3 skid
The design rationale is strong; the size of the benefit on your vessel is what the pilot measures.
Both wellboat systems are offered through a pilot programme. The target is to cut disinfection turnaround by at least 50 % while improving biosecurity control — a target to measure against, not a promise.
Tank volume, circulation loop, hygiene protocol and integration points on your vessel.
Ozone, nanobubble, monitoring and off-gas configuration sized for your wells.
Disinfection trials between assignments, in closed-loop mode.
ORP / TRO, turnaround time, chemical reduction and operational savings, recorded on your vessel.
Additional vessels, with service and monitoring support.
None of this needs to be polished. Rough numbers are enough to start.
The basis for both oxygen sizing and disinfection sizing.
What you carry and how densely, so the oxygen calculation reflects your trips rather than our example.
Where a sidestream can be taken, and what capacity and pressure margin the pumps have.
How oxygen is supplied today, and where a common header to each well could run.
How the wells, piping and equipment are washed, disinfected and verified today, and with what.
How long disinfection and verification actually take. It is the baseline every later result is measured against.
Tell us the number of wells, their volumes, what you carry and how long a turnaround takes today. We will tell you what an ABAN-20 or ARVAND-O3 installation would look like on your vessel, what a pilot would measure, and where we think the honest answer is to leave things as they are.